Recently in Leadership Category

photo credit to moon maker

Fastest Way to the Moon

Accelerate. 
Velocity is know-how
Efficiency indicates intelligence
Those in the know go fast, those who don't go slow.
Tai Chi masters movements are efficient, smooth and ready for lightning fast moves

How to untie the Gordian Knot when your future depends on it?
Cut it.

Complexity belongs to the rocket scientist, not the rocketeers.
Making things complex is not smart, smart is making things simple.

Accelerate around, over, through, under, however you can move past obstacles. 

There is no time like the present to create the future!

Gain, its at the core of everything we are after - whether pleasure, profit, or peace.
But how many of us really understand the tactics of Gain. 

Gamblers understand the reality of winning and losing.
They bet they will gain or they wouldn't play.
You are betting on gains in your stock portfolio.
You are betting on gains in your job.
Gains and losses are visceral.

My Dad was always gaining even when things didn't work out.
Take the hit and move forward. 
There is no time like the present to create the future
Those were all useful gains to appreciate and make part of life.

How do you gain insight into difficult challenges?
How can you gain by letting go?

These questions really go to the essence of being and becoming an Advantage-Maker.
When you can perceive gain and loss in a useful perspective you can adapt and create more effectively.
This is not just about resilience.
You can take everything you have and multiply and amplify the goodness.

If you have not appreciated what you have and then do appreciate it, you have just gained, and life is good.

You can gain in attitude, performance, outcome, experience, better strategy, better approach.
Tactics that gain.
Gain by making things simpler, making things faster, making things easier, making things more meaningful.

Here's a week long task:
1. At the end of every day for the next 7 days identify what you have gained.
2) You can use the lens of faster, easier, simpler, meaningful, multiplied.
3) if you failed that day, and it happens to the best of us, what did you gain from that?
4) If you succeeded, enjoy the gain, it will multiply in meaning and your brain will want to 
keep you on this gain track.

Failure as it relates to gain is not some Jedi mind trick or semantics - 
you might have gained something invaluable.
Complaints will go nowhere unless you do something about it.
Did you learn not to do something in that failure?

I've asked my clients in the past to fail forward.
Let's say you were trying to get more referrals but your efforts were less than adequate.
Did you learn to improve the way you approach the situation? 
Can you improve how you use language to get referrals? 
Did you learn that you need to ask for help?
What ever the effort you got a result - whether good, bad or ...
Take a moment and make it a gain - not to deny the failure, but to make it a useful gain.
Advantage-Makers fail more quickly and learn faster than most.

You see, if your orientation is gain, then our failure can lead to something better.
By letting go of what didn't work, you gain.
If you are lucky, you learn to stay with the unknown and open the door to the original 
If our attitude is stinky, then the failure will only make it worse. 
Don't deny the reality, gain from reality.
 
And for those existential zen oriented, not wanting anything is a gain it itself.
so let me know if you develop a zen koan for gain.

I will be doing this exercise as well and hope to multiply my gains.
Shift the odds in your favor by orienting toward profitable gains.






People have been asking me why all this focus on shifting? 
The implication is we don't want to rock the boat in a storm. 

While that is true, there are a couple of real world consequences.
1) 60% of opportunity is wasted on a daily basis because of failed shifts
2) A reactive mode produces different outcomes than a proactive advantage-making mode.
3) The level of uncertainly and waves of change now pulsating through the economy warrant shift skills at a new level of proficiency for survival and thriving. Being equipped to shift is a survival tactic.

So, how would an advantage-maker approach uncertainty and a sticky challenge?
How would you?
Here's a scenario that approximates real world events.

You are running a huge banking operation and putting in new ATM machines. There is a technical glitch (that's putting it mildly), customers can't get their money, and newspapers are making it front page news. Most of the executives think you should slow down and reduce the customer complaints. Seems sensible, doesn't it?

Select your action from below:
a) You agree and reset the workload and expectations to minimize customer complaints
b) You know that slowing down won't help, but it's important to reduce the level of customer noise and upset.
You select areas that you can proceed with quickly and areas you must slow down.
c) You disagree about slowing down, you go even faster to get the task done sooner. Your reasoning is that going slower will prolong the customer dissatisfaction and the papers will extend the story and perhaps elevate it further.

The conventional approach is answer A. Seems logical and common sense but the outcome is barely adequate.
A better approach is found in answer B. Now you are figuring out the forces at play and trying to thread the needle. The likely outcome is improvement faster.
The Advantage-Maker approach is answer C. You have a good handle of the contextual forces - customers, newspaper, profitability, performance. The way to help customers faster is to go faster. You actually want to help the customer asap. The way to get off the front page faster is to go faster. The way to profitability is go faster. It's counter-intuitive at first look, but standing back from the vantage points gives you an obvious edge.

In order to act with answer C, go faster, you must shift the tactics, and you must know what to look for to shift. This is the value of being equipped with the five tactical shifts. Shift the question, time, interactions, perceptions and structure.

Shift question and the givens - from get rid of customer complains now to get rid of them by going faster
Shift time - from go slower to go faster
Shift interactions - interact with customers differently and with the newspaper
Shift perceptions - this is key, shifting the winning strategy from going slower to going faster
Shifting structure - this is what you are doing with the entire implementation process.

If you didn't answer options C, then look at the same situation with the lens of the 5 shifts. 
This is the value of experience cycles with the right tools. With the wrong lenses, everything continues to be blurry.

To your clarity





Engage!

spoken from the helm of the Spaceship Enterprise

And from the commanding vantage point on planet Earth, W.H Murray of the Scottish Himalayan Expedition spoke on creating and initiative:

“Until one is committed, there is hesitancy, the chance to draw back, always ineffectiveness. Concerning all acts of initiative and creation, there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. All sorts of things occur to help one that would never otherwise have occurred. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in ones favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance which no man could have dreamed would have come his way. 

I have learned a deep respect for one of Goethe’s couplets: ‘Whatever you can do, or dream you can, begin it! Boldness has genius, magic, and power in it.’”

There is leverage in engaging now.

Picard, Murray, Goethe embody the heart of Advantage-Makers

How did Ken Kec do it? (got 4 minutes? Here it is)

 

Last week, I asked if you were Ken Kec, metaphorically. Are you the person in the room to whom everyone listened? http://www.stevenfeinberg.com/blog/

The person who put his/her finger on the essence of the issue that was non-arguable. Ken had command presence, not in ordering people around, but he had command over the issues – including the customer issues and political issues inside the company.

 

So how did Ken Kec do it? Was Ken simply smart or was there a secret sauce?                                      If you recall I said that it wasn’t just that Ken was a sharp guy, it was the nature of his intelligence, in particular, his shift intelligence that mattered. Ken shifted. He shifted the questions, he shifted time, he shifted interactions, he shifted perception and he shifted structures. Its easier to remember the acronym QTIPS (question, time, interaction, perception, structure) for each shift.


Let's pull back the curtain and see behind the scenes what really went on.

Here’s how he did it.

He removed 2 mistakes people make and added 5 shifts that create advantage, and he did it in every situation.

Let me tell you what he didn’t do and you shouldn’t either.

On the don’t do list,

1) He didn’t obsess about unnecessary details, and

2) He didn’t wax platitudes about abstract white space.

If you think this is marginally important, listen to the discussions at your next meeting and you will find time wasted toggling back and forth between obsessive details or abstract pontificating. If you are doing this it won’t help you get to the essence fast.

 

This ability to shift to the right content level, that is, what is relevant, can make a huge difference in your meetings and in your approach. During one strategy session, we made signs that people held up when the group got off target. The signs said, Obsessive Detail, Abstract and Very Obsessive Detail. It made for both an amusing and informative strategy session. The meeting accelerated.

 

What Ken did (on the to do list):

1) The first task in his mind was creating a strategic framework to understand and solve the issue. To do this, to get to the essence he focused his mind on patterns, repeated tendencies. And the patterns he was looking for were the patterns of interaction – between people, between the customer and company. You could say he was looking at the ecology of interactions, a supply chain of interactions. What worked and what didn’t. The relationships between key elements and people. And what kept repeating itself. Ken was intent on determining the real forces at play, and shifting interactions to change the game.

 

2) Next Ken established a hierarchy of importance. What mattered in this specific situation? When people say you need to be more strategic, that actually means you have to think hierarchically. Not who’s who in the office hierarchy but what’s most important relative to the stuff that people care about. For example, which is more important in this situation, profits now or long-term business relations. And if both are important which is more important or what percentage of each? Ken made structural calculations.

 

3) Now Ken did not just accept the givens, he questioned the givens. That’s the basic Shifting the Question aspect of those who have high shift IQ’s. This can be tricky because we live in an assumptive world. It’s like water to a fish; it only realizes when it is out of water. We can be better than fish on most days. Most of our solutions are too small, we can play bigger by penetrating questions that lift us out of the existing sea of expectation. We can frame the issue in a new light. By noticing the patterns we also can begin to question the recalcitrant patterns as Ken did.

 

4) Having questioned the givens he began to think about the options, not a laundry list. He knew what the variables were and could be both creative and practical. For example, if the variables were price, quality, technology and time to market he would move those around in terms of where the big win was for them. As a result he could determine the tendencies for movement and more significantly the momentum tactic. Ken thought both inside the box and out of the box. That’s tactical shifting.

 

5) And finally, knowing the patterns of interactions, the hierarchy of importance he shifted perceptions to influence the outcome. Ken penetrated into the decision triggers of his ‘target audience’ and delivered a non-arguable case. Ken was not just a good sales guy, he was someone who really put on his thinking cap while others were making noise, thinking they were thinking. And he delivered the message just at the right time. 

 

So quick review, Ken set a strategic framework; spotted the patterns, established a hierarchy of importance, questioned the givens, generated options, influenced perception and at the right time.

 

Are you similar to Ken Kec? I hope. If not, you can learn to think, perceive and influence like Ken Kec by improving your shift IQ. Ken wasn’t born with these habits; he acquired them and refined them. Ken studied how to shift the odds in his favor. If you want to shift the odds in your favor you can too.

 

There is no time like the present to create the future.

Next time, you might be the person in the room to whom everyone listens.

About this Archive

This page is a archive of recent entries in the Leadership category.

Influence is the previous category.

Performance is the next category.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Leadership: Monthly Archives